Research and Source Checks
Tools in this category help verify claims, preserve source links, compare public documents, and keep article notes grounded in evidence before a script becomes a video.
Good fit
Resources in this category should solve practical problems for faceless explainer channels and companion archives.
- Primary-source discovery, citation capture, document comparison, and transcript review
- Public archive, policy, standards, and statistics workflows that help verify claims
- Research notes that can be reused in scripts, articles, source indexes, and corrections
Selection safeguards
Commercial relationships should not override reader usefulness, disclosure, source discipline, or platform rules.
- A research tool should not replace judgment, dated source checks, or correction review.
- Commercial resource links are not citations and should not be treated as proof for article claims.
- Any paid placement must be disclosed near the recommendation before a reader acts on it.
Before a resource is listed
A resource should have a clear use case, public landing page, supportable claims, disclosure requirements, and a reason it belongs beside the Stride Labs archive.
The site can prepare resource categories before affiliate links are active, but it should not list fake partners, fake discounts, or unsupported recommendations.
Disclosure. Paid, affiliate, or sponsored relationships should be labeled near the listing.
No guarantees. A resource listing should not promise rankings, approval, views, revenue, or ad performance.
Review process. Check the resource review process before asking for placement.
Intake brief. Use the resource partner intake brief before asking about a listing.
Review route. Send resource-fit notes to luketrodriguez1@gmail.com.